↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury
Published in
Critical Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13915
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The choice of disease-specific versus generic scales is common to many fields of medicine. In the area of traumatic brain injury, evidence is coming forward that disease-specific prognostic models and disease-specific scoring systems are preferable in the intensive care setting. In monitoring prognosis, the use of a calibration belt in validation studies potentially provides accurate and intuitively attractive insight into performance. This approach deserves further empirical evaluation of its added value as well as its limitations.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Professor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 64%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#9,074,886
of 15,488,293 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,662
of 4,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,160
of 191,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#73
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,488,293 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.