You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging and acute low back pain: a pilot study to characterize lumbar muscle activity asymmetries and examine the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-4732-3-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brian C Clark, Stevan Walkowski, Robert R Conatser, David C Eland, John N Howell |
Abstract |
Muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI) measures transverse relaxation time (T2), and allows for determination of the spatial pattern of muscle activation. The purposes of this pilot study were to examine whether MRI-derived T2 or side-to-side differences in T2 (asymmetries) differ in low back muscles between subjects with acute low back pain (LBP) compared to asymptomatic controls, and to determine if a single osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) session alters these T2 properties immediately and 48-hours after treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
Other | 35 | 29% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
Engineering | 7 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care
#19
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,645
of 100,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.