↓ Skip to main content

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for pneumonia
Published in
Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1750-4732-4-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murray Goldstein

Abstract

The pneumonias due to infection continue to be a meaningful threat to the health and viability of persons, particularly those in high risk groups: children, the aged and the debilitated. Noll and colleagues provide us with the results of a well-designed and well-executed multi-institutional controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in the treatment of pneumonia. The data obtained indicate that by intention-to-treat analysis, the addition of OMT to conventional care did not improve the designated outcomes when compared to conventional care only. A disappointing but important finding. However, by per-protocol analysis, the addition of OMT or of light touch decreased length of hospital stay, the duration of intravenous antibiotics and the incidence of respiratory failure and death relative to conventional care only. Further study is called for to explain these surprising results.Meeting the need for randomized clinical trials of the role and efficacy of OMT is a responsibility of high priority for the osteopathic profession in this age of evidence-based medicine. The American Osteopathic Association (AOA) needs to consider reinstating a dues-generated financial set-aside both to increase its support of osteopathic research and to initiate a program of physician-investigator career development awards to recruit and help establish osteopathic clinical investigators in a career in translational and clinical research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 24 29%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care
#12
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,113
of 103,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.