↓ Skip to main content

Home based telemedicine intervention for patients with uncontrolled hypertension: - a real life - non-randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home based telemedicine intervention for patients with uncontrolled hypertension: - a real life - non-randomized study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-14-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Palmira Bernocchi, Simonetta Scalvini, Fabio Bertacchini, Francesca Rivadossi, Maria Lorenza Muiesan

Abstract

Control of blood pressure is frequently inadequate in spite of availability of several classes of well tolerated and effective antihypertensive drugs. Several factors, including the use of suboptimal doses of drugs, inadequate or ineffective treatments and poor drug compliance may be the reason for this phenomenon. The aim of the current non- randomized study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Home-Based Telemedicine service in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,439,840
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#457
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,923
of 228,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.