↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral microbleeds: overview and implications in cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral microbleeds: overview and implications in cognitive impairment
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/alzrt263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergi Martinez-Ramirez, Steven M Greenberg, Anand Viswanathan

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds (MBs) are small chronic brain hemorrhages which are likely caused by structural abnormalities of the small vessels of the brain. Owing to the paramagnetic properties of blood degradation products, MBs can be detected in vivo by using specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Over the last decades, the implementation of these MRI sequences in both epidemiological and clinical studies has revealed MBs as a common finding in many different populations, including healthy individuals. Also, the topographic distribution of these MBs has been shown to be potentially associated with specific underlying vasculopathies. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of these small hemorrhages is still a matter of debate as well as a focus of extensive research. In this article, we aim to review the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and clinical implications of MBs, with special emphasis on the links between lobar MBs, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and Alzheimer's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 20%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 16 8%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 29%
Neuroscience 42 21%
Engineering 12 6%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#995,235
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#128
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,427
of 243,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.