You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-reported outcomes in a trial of exenatide and insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-4-80 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristina Secnik Boye, Louis S Matza, Alan Oglesby, Karen Malley, Sunny Kim, Risa P Hayes, Robert Brodows |
| Abstract |
Patient-reported measures can be used to examine whether drug differences other than clinical efficacy have an impact on outcomes that may be important to patients. Although exenatide and insulin glargine appear to have similar efficacy for treatment of type 2 diabetes, there are several differences between the two treatments that could influence outcomes from the patient's perspective. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether the two drugs were comparable as assessed by patient-reported outcomes using data from a clinical trial in which these injectable medications were added to pre-existing oral treatment regimens. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,293,687
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#292
of 2,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,236
of 66,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.