You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Food consumption patterns of adolescents aged 14–16 years in Kolkata, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-017-0272-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neha Rathi, Lynn Riddell, Anthony Worsley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 396 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 149 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Unknown | 173 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,713,506
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#588
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,724
of 316,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.