You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China’s pharmaceutical industry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lan Qiu, Zi-Ya Chen, Deng-Yu Lu, Hao Hu, Yi-Tao Wang |
Abstract |
In recent years, China has experienced tremendous growth in its pharmaceutical industry. Both the Chinese government and private investors are motivated to invest into pharmaceutical research and development (R&D). However, studies regarding the different behaviors of public and private investment in pharmaceutical R&D are scarce. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the current situation of public funding and private investment into Chinese pharmaceutical R&D. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,778,566
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#778
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,881
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.