↓ Skip to main content

Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study)
Published in
Trials, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin C Gulliford, Tjeerd P van Staa, Lisa McDermott, Gerard McCann, Judith Charlton, Alex Dregan, for the eCRT Research Team

Abstract

There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 44 27%