You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improvements in gait characteristics after intensive resistance and functional training in people with dementia: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Schwenk, Tania Zieschang, Stefan Englert, Gurtej Grewal, Bijan Najafi, Klaus Hauer |
| Abstract |
Preventing and rehabilitating gait disorders in people with dementia during early disease stage is of high importance for staying independent and ambulating safely. However, the evidence gathered in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of exercise training for improving spatio-temporal gait parameters in people with dementia is scarce. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a specific, standardized training regimen can improve gait characteristics in people with dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 101 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 9% |
| Psychology | 17 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 113 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,931,785
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,270
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,947
of 231,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.