↓ Skip to main content

Association between fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene rs9939609 A/T polymorphism and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene rs9939609 A/T polymorphism and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12881-017-0452-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ai Ling Liu, Hui Jun Xie, Hong Yan Xie, Jun Liu, Jie Yin, Jin Song Hu, Cui Ying Peng

Abstract

Up to now, numerous case-control studies have reported the associations between fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene rs9939609 A/T polymorphism and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), however, without a consistent result. Hence we performed current systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the controversial results. Case-control studies reporting the relationship of rs9939609 A/T polymorphism and PCOS published before April 2015 were searched in Pubmed database without language restriction. Data was analyzed by Review Manager 5.2. A total of five studies involving 5010 PCOS patients and 5300 controls were included for further meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that the FTO gene rs9939609 A/T polymorphism was significantly different between PCOS group and control group in different gene models (For AA + AT vs. TT: OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.28-1.55, P < 0.00001. For AA vs. AT + TT: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.25-1.89, P < 0.0001. For AA vs. TT: OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.38-2.18, P < 0.00001. For A vs. T: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.25-1.47, P < 0.00001, respectively) suggesting that A allele was a risk factor for PCOS susceptibility. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in Asian and Caucasian ethnicities also found significant association between rs9939609 A/T polymorphism and PCOS (In Asian subgroup: OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.29-1.59, P < 0.0001. In Caucasian subgroup: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08-1.64, P = 0.008) CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that rs9939609 A/T polymorphism of FTO gene is associated with PCOS risk, and that A allele is a risk factor for PCOS susceptibility simultaneously.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 43 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 51 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,194
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,097
of 325,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.