You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving inhaler adherence in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-15-66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Job FM van Boven, Eline Tommelein, Koen Boussery, Els Mehuys, Stefan Vegter, Guy GO Brusselle, Maureen PMH Rutten-van Mölken, Maarten J Postma |
| Abstract |
The PHARMACOP-intervention significantly improved medication adherence and inhalation technique for patients with COPD compared with usual care. This study aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Spain | 3 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,587,457
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#277
of 3,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,899
of 243,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.