You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of chemostat cultures mimicking different phases of wine fermentations as a tool for quantitative physiological analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Cell Factories, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2859-13-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felícitas Vázquez-Lima, Paulina Silva, Antonio Barreiro, Rubén Martínez-Moreno, Pilar Morales, Manuel Quirós, Ramón González, Joan Albiol, Pau Ferrer |
| Abstract |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most relevant yeast species conducting the alcoholic fermentation that takes place during winemaking. Although the physiology of this model organism has been extensively studied, systematic quantitative physiology studies of this yeast under winemaking conditions are still scarce, thus limiting the understanding of fermentative metabolism of wine yeast strains and the systematic description, modelling and prediction of fermentation processes. In this study, we implemented and validated the use of chemostat cultures as a tool to simulate different stages of a standard wine fermentation, thereby allowing to implement metabolic flux analyses describing the sequence of metabolic states of S. cerevisae along the wine fermentation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 17% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,196
of 1,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,050
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.