↓ Skip to main content

Invasive candidiasis in low birth weight preterm infants: risk factors, clinical course and outcome in a prospective multicenter study of cases and their matched controls

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invasive candidiasis in low birth weight preterm infants: risk factors, clinical course and outcome in a prospective multicenter study of cases and their matched controls
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Barton, Karel O’Brien, Joan L Robinson, Dele H Davies, Kim Simpson, Elizabeth Asztalos, Joanne M Langley, Nicole Le Saux, Reg Sauve, Anne Synnes, Ben Tan, Louis de Repentigny, Earl Rubin, Chuck Hui, Lajos Kovacs, Susan E Richardson

Abstract

This multicenter prospective study of invasive candidiasis (IC) was carried out to determine the risk factors for, incidence of, clinical and laboratory features, treatment and outcome of IC in infants of birth weight <1250 g.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Lecturer 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,334,889
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,278
of 7,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,484
of 228,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#80
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.