You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The WERO group stop smoking competition: main outcomes of a pre- and post- study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-599 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marewa Glover, Anette Kira, Dudley Gentles, Nathan Cowie, Chris Paton, Warren Moetara |
Abstract |
One potential promising strategy for increasing smoking cessation for Māori (Indigenous New Zealanders) and New Zealand resident Pacific Island people is Quit and Win competitions. The current uncontrolled pre and post study, WERO (WERO in Māori language means challenge), differs from previous studies in that it aims to investigate if a stop smoking contest, using both within team support, external support from a team coach and cessation experts, and technology, would be effective in prompting and sustaining quitting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 4 | 44% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 17% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,848,113
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,779
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,047
of 231,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#101
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.