↓ Skip to main content

Documentation of guideline adherence in antenatal records across maternal weight categories: a chart review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Documentation of guideline adherence in antenatal records across maternal weight categories: a chart review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah D McDonald, Clea A Machold, Laura Marshall, Dawn Kingston

Abstract

Documentation in medical records fulfills key functions, including management of care, communication, quality assurance and record keeping. We sought to describe: 1) rates of standard prenatal care as documented in medical charts, and given the higher risks with excess weight, whether this documentation varied among normal weight, overweight and obese women; and 2) adherence to obesity guidelines for obese women as documented in the chart.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,196,917
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,693
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,040
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#71
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.