↓ Skip to main content

Documentation of guideline adherence in antenatal records across maternal weight categories: a chart review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Documentation of guideline adherence in antenatal records across maternal weight categories: a chart review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah D McDonald, Clea A Machold, Laura Marshall, Dawn Kingston

Abstract

Documentation in medical records fulfills key functions, including management of care, communication, quality assurance and record keeping. We sought to describe: 1) rates of standard prenatal care as documented in medical charts, and given the higher risks with excess weight, whether this documentation varied among normal weight, overweight and obese women; and 2) adherence to obesity guidelines for obese women as documented in the chart.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 26%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,292,158
of 9,880,566 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,585
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,740
of 175,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#68
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,880,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.