You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of facility-based sexual and reproductive health services for female sex workers in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Globalization and Health, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-10-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashar Dhana, Stanley Luchters, Lizzie Moore, Yves Lafort, Anuradha Roy, Fiona Scorgie, Matthew Chersich |
| Abstract |
Several biological, behavioural, and structural risk factors place female sex workers (FSWs) at heightened risk of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and other adverse sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes. FSW projects in many settings have demonstrated effective ways of altering this risk, improving the health and wellbeing of these women. Yet the optimum delivery model of FSW projects in Africa is unclear. We systematically describe intervention packages, service-delivery models, and extent of government involvement in these services in Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 94 | 23% |
| Researcher | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 20% |
| Unknown | 94 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 28 | 7% |
| Psychology | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,356,578
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#762
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,865
of 229,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.