↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volume induces inflammation in patients without lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volume induces inflammation in patients without lung disease
Published in
Critical Care, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc8919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira, Marcio Pereira Hetzel, Mauro dos Anjos Silva, Daniele Dallegrave, Gilberto Friedman

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) with high tidal volumes may induce or aggravate lung injury in critical ill patients. We compared the effects of a protective versus a conventional ventilatory strategy, on systemic and lung production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in patients without lung disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 46 30%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,920
of 110,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.