You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of ICU triage decisions on patient mortality: a cost-effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David L Edbrooke, Cosetta Minelli, Gary H Mills, Gaetano Iapichino, Angelo Pezzi, Davide Corbella, Philip Jacobs, Anne Lippert, Joergen Wiis, Antonio Pesenti, Nicolo Patroniti, Romain Pirracchio, Didier Payen, Gabriel Gurman, Jan Bakker, Jozef Kesecioglu, Chris Hargreaves, Simon L Cohen, Mario Baras, Antonio Artigas, Charles L Sprung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 28% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 51% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#16,123,626
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,176
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,783
of 197,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#60
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.