↓ Skip to main content

A review of malaria transmission dynamics in forest ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of malaria transmission dynamics in forest ecosystems
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narayani Prasad Kar, Ashwani Kumar, Om P Singh, Jane M Carlton, Nutan Nanda

Abstract

Malaria continues to be a major health problem in more than 100 endemic countries located primarily in tropical and sub-tropical regions around the world. Malaria transmission is a dynamic process and involves many interlinked factors, from uncontrollable natural environmental conditions to man-made disturbances to nature. Almost half of the population at risk of malaria lives in forest areas. Forests are hot beds of malaria transmission as they provide conditions such as vegetation cover, temperature, rainfall and humidity conditions that are conducive to distribution and survival of malaria vectors. Forests often lack infrastructure and harbor tribes with distinct genetic traits, socio-cultural beliefs and practices that greatly influence malaria transmission dynamics. Here we summarize the various topographical, entomological, parasitological, human ecological and socio-economic factors, which are crucial and shape malaria transmission in forested areas. An in-depth understanding and synthesis of the intricate relationship of these parameters in achieving better malaria control in various types of forest ecosystems is emphasized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 333 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 85 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 9%
Environmental Science 23 7%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 97 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,197,145
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,814
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,012
of 228,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.