↓ Skip to main content

Experience of maintaining tooth brushing for children born with a cleft lip and/or palate

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience of maintaining tooth brushing for children born with a cleft lip and/or palate
Published in
BMC Oral Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12903-017-0412-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yin-Ling Lin, Karen Davies, Peter Callery

Abstract

Children with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate (CL/P) have been reported to have poorer oral health than those without the condition. The consequences for these children can be particularly problematic due to implications for future treatments. Tooth brushing is an important behaviour contributing to children's oral health, but is under researched in the CL/P population. The aim of the study is to explore the experience of maintaining tooth brushing among children in the United Kingdom (UK) with a CL/P and their parents. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty-two parents and sixteen children with a CL/P (5-11 years), recruited at a cleft centre in the UK. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Three key themes were drawn from the qualitative data: first, parents of children with a CL/P generally had strong motivation to look after their children's teeth but children's motivation was inconsistent. Second, parents were primary enablers of children's tooth brushing behaviour, often employing approaches adapted to their child's characteristics to encourage tooth brushing. Third, a range of obstacles were encountered by parents and children in maintaining regular tooth brushing behaviours. They reported obstacles such as issues related to CL/P, 'forgetting' and childhood illness. The paper suggests that parents of children with a CL/P need support to enact their intention to maintain regular tooth brushing and prioritise tooth brushing within the context of demanding and dynamic family life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 22 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,060,552
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#478
of 1,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,654
of 320,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.