↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajesh Puranik, Belinda Gray, Helen Lackey, Laura Yeates, Geoffrey Parker, Johan Duflou, Christopher Semsarian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 21 26%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,323,815
of 20,614,102 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#230
of 1,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,792
of 201,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,614,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them