You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing the argument for validity of the Alberta Context Tool with healthcare aides in residential long-term care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carole A Estabrooks, Janet E Squires, Leslie A Hayduk, Greta G Cummings, Peter G Norton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,569,430
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,750
of 2,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,751
of 119,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.