Title |
Ribosome signatures aid bacterial translation initiation site identification
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12915-017-0416-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam Giess, Veronique Jonckheere, Elvis Ndah, Katarzyna Chyżyńska, Petra Van Damme, Eivind Valen |
Abstract |
While methods for annotation of genes are increasingly reliable, the exact identification of translation initiation sites remains a challenging problem. Since the N-termini of proteins often contain regulatory and targeting information, developing a robust method for start site identification is crucial. Ribosome profiling reads show distinct patterns of read length distributions around translation initiation sites. These patterns are typically lost in standard ribosome profiling analysis pipelines, when reads from footprints are adjusted to determine the specific codon being translated. Utilising these signatures in combination with nucleotide sequence information, we build a model capable of predicting translation initiation sites and demonstrate its high accuracy using N-terminal proteomics. Applying this to prokaryotic translatomes, we re-annotate translation initiation sites and provide evidence of N-terminal truncations and extensions of previously annotated coding sequences. These re-annotations are supported by the presence of structural and sequence-based features next to N-terminal peptide evidence. Finally, our model identifies 61 novel genes previously undiscovered in the Salmonella enterica genome. Signatures within ribosome profiling read length distributions can be used in combination with nucleotide sequence information to provide accurate genome-wide identification of translation initiation sites. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 44% |
Indonesia | 1 | 11% |
Sweden | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 30% |
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |