You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Molecular evolution of the enzymes involved in the sphingolipid metabolism of Leishmania: selection pressure in relation to functional divergence and conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-142 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vineetha Mandlik, Sonali Shinde, Shailza Singh |
Abstract |
Selection pressure governs the relative mutability and the conservedness of a protein across the protein family. Biomolecules (DNA, RNA and proteins) continuously evolve under the effect of evolutionary pressure that arises as a consequence of the host parasite interaction. IPCS (Inositol phosphorylceramide synthase), SPL (Sphingosine-1-P lyase) and SPT (Serine palmitoyl transferase) represent three important enzymes involved in the sphingolipid metabolism of Leishmania. These enzymes are responsible for maintaining the viability and infectivity of the parasite and have been classified as druggable targets in the parasite metabolome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
Chemistry | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,624
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,205
of 242,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#38
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.