The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fat intake and injury in female runners
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-5-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen E Gerlach, Harold W Burton, Joan M Dorn, John J Leddy, Peter J Horvath |
| Abstract |
Our purpose was to determine the relationship between energy intake, energy availability, dietary fat and lower extremity injury in adult female runners. We hypothesized that runners who develop overuse running-related injuries have lower energy intakes, lower energy availability and lower fat intake compared to non-injured runners. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,199,907
of 26,219,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#273
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,993
of 450,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#252
of 859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,219,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.