↓ Skip to main content

Potential link between caffeine consumption and pediatric depression: A case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential link between caffeine consumption and pediatric depression: A case-control study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-11-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cássia R Benko, Antonio C Farias, Lucilene G Farias, Erico F Pereira, Fernando M Louzada, Mara L Cordeiro

Abstract

Early-onset depressive disorders can have severe consequences both from developmental and functional aspects. The etiology of depressive disorders is complex and multi-factorial, with an intricate interaction among environmental factors and genetic predisposition. While data from studies on adults suggest that caffeine is fairly safe, effects of caffeine in children, who are in period of rapid brain development, are currently unknown. Furthermore, systematic research addressing the relationship between depressive symptoms in children and caffeine consumption is lacking.The present study examined the effects of caffeine consumption on depressed mood in children with depression and non-depressed participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 24%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Psychology 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,472,870
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#150
of 2,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,944
of 123,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.