↓ Skip to main content

Surfactant protein A genetic variants associate with severe respiratory insufficiency in pandemic influenza A virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surfactant protein A genetic variants associate with severe respiratory insufficiency in pandemic influenza A virus infection
Published in
Critical Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estefanía Herrera-Ramos, Marta López-Rodríguez, José Juan Ruíz-Hernández, Juan Pablo Horcajada, Luis Borderías, Elisabeth Lerma, José Blanquer, María Carmen Pérez-González, María Isabel García-Laorden, Yanira Florido, Virginia Mas-Bosch, Milagro Montero, José María Ferrer, Luisa Sorlí, Carlos Vilaplana, Olga Rajas, Marisa Briones, Javier Aspa, Eduardo López-Granados, Jordi Solé-Violán, Felipe Rodríguez de Castro, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego

Abstract

Inherited variability in host immune responses influences susceptibility and outcome of Influenza A virus (IAV) infection, but these factors remain largely unknown. Components of the innate immune response may be crucial in the first days of the infection. The collectins surfactant protein (SP)-A1, -A2, and -D and mannose-binding lectin (MBL) neutralize IAV infectivity, although only SP-A2 can establish an efficient neutralization of poorly glycosylated pandemic IAV strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 18 32%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,379
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,047
of 242,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#113
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.