↓ Skip to main content

Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America's scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America's scientific output in Public Health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grisel Zacca-González, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Félix de Moya-Anegón

Abstract

In the greater framework of the essential functions of Public Health, our focus is on a systematic, objective, external evaluation of Latin American scientific output, to compare its publications in the area of Public Health with those of other major geographic zones. We aim to describe the regional distribution of output in Public Health, and the level of visibility and specialization, for Latin America; it can then be characterized and compared in the international context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 127 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor 10 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Arts and Humanities 10 7%
Computer Science 8 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,280,219
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,869
of 16,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,219
of 235,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#87
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.