Title |
Medial open transversus abdominis plane (MOTAP) catheters for analgesia following open liver resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-241 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Karanicolas, Sean Cleary, Paul McHardy, Stuart McCluskey, Jason Sawyer, Salima Ladak, Calvin Law, Alice Wei, Natalie Coburn, Raynauld Ko, Joel Katz, Alex Kiss, James Khan, Srinivas Coimbatore, Jenny Lam-McCulloch, Hance Clarke |
Abstract |
The current standard for pain control following liver surgery is intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) or epidural analgesia. We have developed a modification of a regional technique called medial open transversus abdominis plane (MOTAP) catheter analgesia. The MOTAP technique involves surgically placed catheters through the open surgical site into a plane between the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominis muscle superiorly. The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of this technique.Methods /design: This protocol describes a multicentre, prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for open liver resection through a subcostal incision will be enrolled. All patients will have two MOTAP catheters placed at the conclusion of surgery. Patients will be randomized to one of two parallel groups: experimental (local anaesthetic through MOTAP catheters) or placebo (normal saline through MOTAP catheters). Both groups will also receive IV PCA. The primary endpoint is mean cumulative postoperative opioid consumption over the first 2 postoperative days (48 hours). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, patient functional outcomes, and the incidence of complications. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 36% |