↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial and toxicological activities of five medicinal plant species from Cameroon Traditional Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobial and toxicological activities of five medicinal plant species from Cameroon Traditional Medicine
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jules CN Assob, Henri LF Kamga, Dickson S Nsagha, Anna L Njunda, Peter F Nde, Emmanuel A Asongalem, Abdel J Njouendou, Bertrand Sandjon, Veronique B Penlap

Abstract

Infectious diseases caused by multiresistant microbial strains are on the increase. Fighting these diseases with natural products may be more efficacious. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of methanolic, ethylacetate (EtOAc) and hexanic fractions of five Cameroonian medicinal plants (Piptadeniastum africana, Cissus aralioides, Hileria latifolia, Phyllanthus muellerianus and Gladiolus gregasius) against 10 pathogenic microorganisms of the urogenital and gastrointestinal tracts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 9%
Chemistry 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 48 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2011.
All research outputs
#12,847,342
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,378
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,087
of 123,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.