↓ Skip to main content

A healthy approach to dietary fats: understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,529)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
98 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
16 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
859 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A healthy approach to dietary fats: understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion
Published in
Nutrition Journal, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0271-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann G. Liu, Nikki A. Ford, Frank B. Hu, Kathleen M. Zelman, Dariush Mozaffarian, Penny M. Kris-Etherton

Abstract

Consumers are often confused about nutrition research findings and recommendations. As content experts, it is essential that nutrition scientists communicate effectively. A case-study of the history of dietary fat science and recommendations is presented, summarizing presentations from an Experimental Biology Symposium that addressed techniques for effective scientific communication and used the scientific discourse of public understanding of dietary fats and health as an example of challenges in scientific communication. Decades of dietary recommendations have focused on balancing calorie intake and energy expenditure and decreasing fat. Reducing saturated fat has been a cornerstone of dietary recommendations for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction. However, evidence from observational studies and randomized clinical trials demonstrates that replacing saturated fat with carbohydrates, specifically refined, has no benefit on CVD risk, while substituting polyunsaturated fats for either saturated fat or carbohydrate reduces risk. A significant body of research supports the unique health benefits of dietary patterns and foods that contain plant and marine sources of unsaturated fats. Yet, after decades of focus on low-fat diets, many consumers, food manufacturers, and restauranteurs remain confused about the role of dietary fats on disease risk and sources of healthy fats. Shifting dietary recommendations to focus on food-based dietary patterns would facilitate translation to the public and potentially remedy widespread misperceptions about what constitutes a healthful dietary pattern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 859 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 859 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 186 22%
Student > Master 99 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 6%
Researcher 51 6%
Other 44 5%
Other 112 13%
Unknown 314 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 116 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 103 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 8%
Chemistry 24 3%
Other 123 14%
Unknown 349 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 327. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#104,012
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#42
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,306
of 324,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.