↓ Skip to main content

Impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment on transition from ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis to ventilator-associated pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of appropriate antimicrobial treatment on transition from ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis to ventilator-associated pneumonia
Published in
Critical Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13940
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saad Nseir, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Demosthenes Makris, Emmanuelle Jaillette, Marios Karvouniaris, Jordi Valles, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Antonio Artigas

Abstract

Two small randomized controlled trials have suggested beneficial effects of antibiotic treatment in patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). The primary aim of this study is to determine the impact of appropriate antibiotic treatment on transition from VAT to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients. The secondary objective was to determine the incidence of VAP in patients with VAT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 13%
Other 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 29 27%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,309,547
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,034
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,757
of 243,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.