You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do expert assessments converge? An exploratory case study of evaluating and managing a blood supply risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-666 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Eyles, Nancy Heddle, Kathryn Webert, Emmy Arnold, Bronwen McCurdy |
| Abstract |
Examining professional assessments of a blood product recall/withdrawal and its implications for risk and public health, the paper introduces ideas about perceptions of minimal risk and its management. It also describes the context of publicly funded blood transfusion in Canada and the withdrawal event that is the basis of this study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#13,122,371
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,191
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,311
of 123,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#118
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.