You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automatic protective ventilation using the ARDSNet protocol with the additional monitoring of electrical impedance tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13937 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anake Pomprapa, David Schwaiberger, Philipp Pickerodt, Onno Tjarks, Burkhard Lachmann, Steffen Leonhardt |
| Abstract |
Automatic ventilation for patients with respiratory failure aims at reducing mortality and can minimize the workload of clinical staff, offer standardized continuous care, and ultimately save the overall cost of therapy. We therefore developed a prototype for closed-loop ventilation using acute respiratory distress syndrome network (ARDSNet) protocol, called autoARDSNet. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 58% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,368,246
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,061
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,245
of 243,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.