↓ Skip to main content

Carotid intima media thickness is associated with body fat abnormalities in HIV-infected patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carotid intima media thickness is associated with body fat abnormalities in HIV-infected patients
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Freitas, Davide Carvalho, Ana Cristina Santos, António José Madureira, Esteban Martinez, Jorge Pereira, António Sarmento, José Luís Medina

Abstract

HIV-infected patients may be at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, and lipodystrophy is generally associated with proatherogenic metabolic disturbances. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been used as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis and it has been shown to be an independent risk factor for CV disease. Our objective was to evaluate cIMT in HIV-infected patients on combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART) with and without lipodystrophy defined by fat mass ratio (L-FMR), and to determine the association of lipodystrophy and visceral obesity [(visceral (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volume and VAT/SAT ratio, objectively evaluated by CT scan] with cIMT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 49%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,548,753
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,198
of 8,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,097
of 244,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#110
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.