↓ Skip to main content

Prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical routine

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical routine
Published in
Trials, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne de Waha, Ingo Eitel, Steffen Desch, Georg Fuernau, Philipp Lurz, Thomas Stiermaier, Stephan Blazek, Gerhard Schuler, Holger Thiele

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of infarct size, microvascular obstruction (MO), myocardial salvage index (MSI), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EFCMR) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in comparison to traditional outcome markers in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reperfused by primary percutaneous intervention (PCI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 31%