You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Migration intensity has no effect on peak HIV prevalence: an ecological study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-350 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Kenyon, Robert Colebunders, Helene Voeten, Mark Lurie |
Abstract |
Correctly identifying the determinants of generalized HIV epidemics is crucial to bringing down ongoing high HIV incidence in these countries. High rates of migration are believed to be an important determinant of HIV prevalence. This study has two aims. Firstly, it evaluates the ecological association between levels of internal and international migration and national peak HIV prevalence using thirteen variables from a variety of sources to capture various aspects of internal and international migration intensity. Secondly, it examines the relationship between circular migration and HIV at an individual and population-level in South Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Belgium | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 10% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,414,343
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#334
of 8,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,728
of 234,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.