You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What time-lag for a retraction search on PubMed?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evelyne Decullier, Laure Huot, Hervé Maisonneuve |
| Abstract |
To investigate fraud and errors, scientists have studied cohorts of retraction notices. These researches have been performed using a PubMed search on publication type "retraction of publication" which retrieves the notices of the retractions. We assessed the stability of the indexation of retraction notices over a 15-month period and what was the time-lag to get stability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Serbia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
| Librarian | 5 | 20% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 28% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,063,614
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#101
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,837
of 230,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.