↓ Skip to main content

Human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: case series of 30 subjects with Hereditary Ataxia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: case series of 30 subjects with Hereditary Ataxia
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-9-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wan-Zhang Yang, Yun Zhang, Fang Wu, Min Zhang, SC Cho, Chun-Zhen Li, Shao-Hui Li, Guo-Jian Shu, You-Xiang Sheng, Ning Zhao, Ying Tang, Shu Jiang, Shan Jiang, Matthew Gandjian, Thomas E Ichim, Xiang Hu

Abstract

The differential diagnosis for hereditary ataxia encompasses a variety of diseases characterized by both autosomal dominant and recessive inheritance. There are no curative treatments available for these neurodegenerative conditions. This open label treatment study used human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cells (CBMC) combined with rehabilitation training as potential disease modulators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,637,200
of 23,879,989 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#439
of 4,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,145
of 113,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,879,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.