You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multicenter assessment of sedation and delirium practices in the intensive care units in Poland - is this common practice in Eastern Europe?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-017-0415-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katarzyna Kotfis, Małgorzata Zegan-Barańska, Maciej Żukowski, Krzysztof Kusza, Mariusz Kaczmarczyk, E. Wesley Ely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Italy | 1 | 10% |
Japan | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Researcher | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 42 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 21% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 48 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,361,161
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#278
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,167
of 326,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.