↓ Skip to main content

Systematic training in focused cardiopulmonary ultrasound affects decision-making in the prehospital setting – two case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic training in focused cardiopulmonary ultrasound affects decision-making in the prehospital setting – two case reports
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-22-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Kollander Jakobsen, Morten Thingemann Bøtker, Lars Peter Lawrence, Erik Sloth, Lars Knudsen

Abstract

We present two cases from the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in Denmark, in which prehospital physicians trained in cardiac ultrasound (FATE) disclosed significant pathology that induced a radical change for the critical patient's course.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 20 30%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,064,506
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#776
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,571
of 227,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.