↓ Skip to main content

The views of key leaders in South Africa on implementation of family medicine: critical role in the district health system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The views of key leaders in South Africa on implementation of family medicine: critical role in the district health system
Published in
BMC Primary Care, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shabir Moosa, Bob Mash, Anselme Derese, Wim Peersman

Abstract

Integrated team-based primary care is an international imperative. This is required more so in Africa, where fragmented verticalised care dominates. South Africa is trying to address this with health reforms, including Primary Health Care Re-engineering. Family physicians are already contributing to primary care despite family medicine being only fully registered as a full specialty in South Africa in 2008. However the views of leaders on family medicine and the role of family physicians is not clear, especially with recent health reforms. The aim of this study was to understand the views of key government and academic leaders in South Africa on family medicine, roles of family physicians and human resource issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2014.
All research outputs
#19,962,154
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,892
of 2,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,694
of 242,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.