You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Procedures for assessing psychological predictors of injuries in circus artists: a pilot prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian Shrier, John S Raglin, Emily B Levitan, Murray A Mittleman, Russell J Steele, Janette Powell |
| Abstract |
Research on psychological risk factors for injury has focused on stable traits. Our objective was to test the feasibility of a prospective longitudinal study designed to examine labile psychological states as risk factors of injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,504
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,478
of 228,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.