↓ Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant imatinib in patients with locally advanced non metastatic GIST in the prospective BFR14 trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neoadjuvant imatinib in patients with locally advanced non metastatic GIST in the prospective BFR14 trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurore Blesius, Philippe A Cassier, François Bertucci, Jerome Fayette, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Binh Bui, Antoine Adenis, Maria Rios, Didier Cupissol, David Pérol, Jean-Yves Blay, Axel Le Cesne

Abstract

The role of surgery in the management of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the era of imatinib mesylate (IM) remains debated. We analyzed the outcome of patients with non metastatic locally advanced primary GIST treated with IM within the prospective BFR14 phase III trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,906,939
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,827
of 8,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,598
of 197,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.