You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taiwan Y-chromosomal DNA variation and its relationship with Island Southeast Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-15-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean A Trejaut, Estella S Poloni, Ju-Chen Yen, Ying-Hui Lai, Jun-Hun Loo, Chien-Liang Lee, Chun-Lin He, Marie Lin |
| Abstract |
Much of the data resolution of the haploid non-recombining Y chromosome (NRY) haplogroup O in East Asia are still rudimentary and could be an explanatory factor for current debates on the settlement history of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA). Here, 81 slowly evolving markers (mostly SNPs) and 17 Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats were used to achieve higher level molecular resolution. Our aim is to investigate if the distribution of NRY DNA variation in Taiwan and ISEA is consistent with a single pre-Neolithic expansion scenario from Southeast China to all ISEA, or if it better fits an expansion model from Taiwan (the OOT model), or whether a more complex history of settlement and dispersals throughout ISEA should be envisioned. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 5 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,352,270
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#28
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,969
of 243,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.