You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MAP-RSeq: Mayo Analysis Pipeline for RNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna R Kalari, Asha A Nair, Jaysheel D Bhavsar, Daniel R O’Brien, Jaime I Davila, Matthew A Bockol, Jinfu Nie, Xiaojia Tang, Saurabh Baheti, Jay B Doughty, Sumit Middha, Hugues Sicotte, Aubrey E Thompson, Yan W Asmann, Jean-Pierre A Kocher |
| Abstract |
Although the costs of next generation sequencing technology have decreased over the past years, there is still a lack of simple-to-use applications, for a comprehensive analysis of RNA sequencing data. There is no one-stop shop for transcriptomic genomics. We have developed MAP-RSeq, a comprehensive computational workflow that can be used for obtaining genomic features from transcriptomic sequencing data, for any genome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,355,251
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#150
of 7,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,061
of 243,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#4
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.