↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of family mediation and the role of family violence: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of family mediation and the role of family violence: study protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Cleak, Margot Schofield, Andrew Bickerdike

Abstract

Family law reforms in Australia require separated parents in dispute to attempt mandatory family dispute resolution (FDR) in community-based family services before court attendance. However, there are concerns about such services when clients present with a history of high conflict and family violence. This study protocol describes a longitudinal study of couples presenting for family mediation services. The study aims to describe the profile of family mediation clients, including type of family violence, and determine the impact of violence profiles on FDR processes and outcomes, such as the type and durability of shared parenting arrangements and clients' satisfaction with mediated agreements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 35 25%
Psychology 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,317
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,722
of 305,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#237
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.