↓ Skip to main content

Boolean ErbB network reconstructions and perturbation simulations reveal individual drug response in different breast cancer cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Boolean ErbB network reconstructions and perturbation simulations reveal individual drug response in different breast cancer cell lines
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-8-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Von der Heyde, Christian Bender, Frauke Henjes, Johanna Sonntag, Ulrike Korf, Tim Beißbarth

Abstract

Despite promising progress in targeted breast cancer therapy, drug resistance remains challenging.The monoclonal antibody drugs trastuzumab and pertuzumab as well as the small molecule inhibitorerlotinib were designed to prevent ErbB-2 and ErbB-1 receptor induced deregulated proteinsignalling, contributing to tumour progression. The oncogenic potential of ErbB receptors unfolds incase of overexpression or mutations. Dimerisation with other receptors allows to bypass pathwayblockades. Our intention is to reconstruct the ErbB network to reveal resistance mechanisms. Weused longitudinal proteomic data of ErbB receptors and downstream targets in the ErbB-2 amplifiedbreast cancer cell lines BT474, SKBR3 and HCC1954 treated with erlotinib, trastuzumab orpertuzumab, alone or combined, up to 60 minutes and 30 hours, respectively. In a Boolean modellingapproach, signalling networks were reconstructed based on these data in a cell line and time coursespecific manner, including prior literature knowledge. Finally, we simulated network response toinhibitor combinations to detect signalling nodes reflecting growth inhibition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 12 15%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Computer Science 6 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,916,367
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#518
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,776
of 227,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.