↓ Skip to main content

Chocolate flavanols and skin photoprotection: a parallel, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chocolate flavanols and skin photoprotection: a parallel, double-blind, randomized clinical trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Andres Mogollon, Catherine Boivin, Simone Lemieux, Claudine Blanchet, Joël Claveau, Sylvie Dodin

Abstract

Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation has deleterious effects on the skin, including sunburn, photoaging and cancer. Chocolate flavanols are naturally-occurring antioxidant and anti-inflammatory molecules that could play a role in preventing cutaneous UV damage. We investigated the influence of 12-week high-flavanol chocolate (HFC) consumption on skin sensitivity to UV radiation, measured by minimal erythema dose (MED). We also evaluated skin elasticity and hydration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Mauritius 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 20%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#646,323
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#197
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,968
of 233,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.